I think the state should/could make a convincing case that the children are being put back in the control of, and considered the property of, Warren Jeffs - convicted of accessory to rape of a 14 year old and indicted for other crimes against children.
I understand why the judge put as many restrictions on them as possible - I can’t see this as a family law situation, in other than a very warped sense.
Thought crimes and belief systems are not against the law in this country, yet. Illegal acts are.
Not “family law”, just law. If laws were/are broken, they will have to be prosecuted one at a time, not bulk. There’s no such thing as bulk law.
>> I think the state should/could make a convincing case that the children are being put back in the control of, and considered the property of, Warren Jeffs
Correct me if I’m wrong — but isn’t Warren Jeffs in jail doing five-to-life? Precisely how are these kids to be considered his property, or under his control, if they’re returned to their parents?
Warren Jeffs is in prison and I think that’s a good place for him.