Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
They are taught that the children belong to the prophet and he has removed parents, “re-assigned” children many times.

Which may not be a crime. When the cult leader says a particular child (legal definition) must marry an adult, that is a crime. But when a girl has reached legal age and is arranged to marry, that is not. The evidence certainly suggests some crimes took place, but each of those cases must be investigated and prosecuted separately. Anything else is collective punishment, whether or not you agree with the parents or the leader.

20 posted on 06/02/2008 3:46:24 PM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

I think I understand your point:

There is a difference when the person is of legal age. We are talking here only about minor children.

>>>The evidence certainly suggests some crimes took place, but each of those cases must be investigated and prosecuted separately.

Yes, but a child need not be abused or harmed for the crime of endangerment to have been committed. That’s my argument for what has happened here.

If it is shown that a parent placed their child in the control of someone who has ordered rape, and that they will allow the same crime to be done to their child if Jeffs (or anyone for that matter) wishes - I think that’s a clear and real danger to the child.

thanks for your reply.


22 posted on 06/02/2008 4:08:39 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson