Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr

I repeat again. Jeffs is in jail. In jail in another state. Not running around raping or abusing kids. In jail. For a long time with more pending charges. He is far from Texas and the compound. Not anywhere near it. Not able to abuse the kids. Get it yet?

If they believe he is the messiah and believe that children should have children at 12 who cares, as long as those beliefs are not acted upon. We do not prosecute thought crimes nor prosecute thought crimes based on religion. In your world perhaps, but the US constitution protects us.


19 posted on 06/02/2008 2:57:34 PM PDT by commonguymd ("Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither"- Bejamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: commonguymd

Thanks for your reply:

>>Not able to abuse the kids. Get it yet?

His conviction was for ordering the rape of a 14 year old girl. He need not be present; there are women whose marriage was ordered by him who have never seen him.

The crime he was convicted of can easily occur again. Controlling and being responsible for a criminal act from prison is not that rare. He is not in solitary and has a great deal of communications privileges.

So, the case I’m making is that if a parent willingly gives control of their minor child to a known convicted child abuser (rape and currently indicted for sexual abuse of a child), then, I believe, criminal endangerment has occurred.

I know we disagree here, and I appreciate your courteous replies.


21 posted on 06/02/2008 4:02:57 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson