“If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president. It’s kind of a pipe dream, it’s a personal fantasy of mine, but I don’t think it’s going to happen.”
Amen, and amen.
The idea is in John Lott’s book “Freedomnomics”, chapter 5 pg 160 in the hardback edition.
Of course I support women’s right to vote, but it does seem to have led the country leftward.
There are more solutions, other than taking their vote away, to the problem that women tend to vote in favor of government protections. Can you think of one?
The underlying reason, as I see it, is that generally, women are more willing than men to trade freedom away for security.
"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen."
No Ann, it just means you get a different kind of Democrat Party.
Liberal women will always take away your liberty and your money for their security.
Always.
Guaranteed.
Since the time the 19th Amendment was passed, we have had NO president with facial hair (which had been the norm prior to Wilson.)