Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All About Me
Primetime Politics ^ | May 29, 2008 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 05/29/2008 3:25:08 AM PDT by Nony

Here is how our baby-boom generation solves problems:

-- Recently, George Bush went to Saudi Arabia to ask the ruling House of Saud to pump more oil. That request had about as much chance of success as the Democratic-led congressional effort to “sue” the Saudis in American courts for their selfish “price-gouging.”

The current debate about energy in the United States has devolved into doing the same old thing—consume, don’t produce and complain—while somehow expecting different results. Congress talks endlessly about the bright future of wind, solar and new fuels, while it stops us from getting through the messy present by utilizing abundant coal, shale and tar sands; nuclear power; and oil still untapped in Alaska and off our coasts.

-- For the past five years, we fretted over a “housing boom” that had priced an entire generation out of the market. In response, government and lending agencies got “creative” by relaxing standards to allow shaky “first-time” buyers into the red-hot market of high-priced homes. Home-improvement TV shows proliferated on how to “flip” houses and buy “no-down-payment” properties.

When the bubble inevitably burst, cries of outrage followed about how “they” (never “we") caused a “depression” in housing. Our leaders shrieked about greedy lenders and incompetent regulators who foreclosed on us—never that the American people themselves caused much of the speculation problem, or that housing prices are finally becoming affordable again for new couples.

(Excerpt) Read more at primetimepolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boomers; vdh; victordavishanson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Nony
From the article: And it is not conservative-versus-liberal politics, but generational chaos.

 Sorry Dr. Hanson,  we feel your shame as a Boomer, and I know you're trying your turn at self-effacement.  Nevertheless, I have to wonder if perhaps this is easier to do this than to face the very trans-generational reality of liberalism, that which you should be able to see fairly clearly  in the mirror.

21 posted on 05/29/2008 9:39:05 PM PDT by Harrius Magnus (I am the town square.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nony

“For the past five years, we fretted over a “housing boom” that had priced an entire generation out of the market. In response, government and lending agencies got “creative” by relaxing standards to allow shaky “first-time” buyers into the red-hot market of high-priced homes. “

Hanson manages to get it backwards. “Creative lending” wasn’t a response to the housing boom, it’s the fuel that drove it.


22 posted on 05/29/2008 10:25:12 PM PDT by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1

“Boomers born in the late forties and early fifties came of age in the sixties and early seventies. They aided the commies and helped them kill our soldiers.”

That makes me wonder who you think it was filling the ranks of the Army in South Vietnam all those years. The first ‘boomers were 18 years old when the Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred in 1964. Who do you think was getting drafted to fight the Vietnam War?

As for ‘boomers aiding the commies, there certainly were some of those, too. What amazes me is that some, like Michael Medved, have managed to insinuate themselves into positions of influence in “conservative” circles.


23 posted on 05/29/2008 10:35:48 PM PDT by Pelham (Press 1 for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

That’s a disturbing picture - what’s it from? Reminds me to buy more gold.


24 posted on 05/30/2008 10:59:50 AM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Far more of the commie loving boomers than patriots. BTW You don't have to wonder about me. On my year of eligibility my lottery number was ... dang I forgot. Somewhere in the 340’s as I recall. I enlisted in the Navy and went to Nuke subs. I lived the time.

Mike apparently had some kind of epiphinity some time back and became a middle of the road conservative. Somewhere between Sean and a middle of the road moderate. I'd give him a weak B overall. He is a decent man.

25 posted on 05/30/2008 3:52:46 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

Beats me who photoshopped it, but I like it!


26 posted on 05/30/2008 8:22:52 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson