Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Que Sarah, Sarah
The American Spectator ^ | 5/26/08 | Thomas Cheplick

Posted on 05/29/2008 12:54:37 AM PDT by Dawnsblood

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Dawnsblood

Lindsey Graham is already jockeying to be the 1st Female Veep.


41 posted on 05/29/2008 6:37:55 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Take it from an Alaskan, Sarah is not all she is cracked up to be. Yes she is an eyeful, but not too much between the ears. She has grown the state budget and bureaucracy to record size in history. Her handlers have bungled the gas pipeline so bad we may never see one here. She works better with the democrats than her own party because they stroke her ego while she does their bidding. Maybe she should join mccain!


42 posted on 05/29/2008 7:18:23 AM PDT by strongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Possibly because my grandma is the only woman I know who actually owns a rolling a pin and she wouldn’t hit me. :)

What would you call those women and effete male journalists who fawned over Hillary’s “honest show of heartfelt emotion” if not stupid?

In fact I do feel contempt for these ignorant “swing voters” of both genders who unfortunately hold the fate of the country in their hands. They care about image not substance, if Palin presents an image attractive to these tools that’s a good thing. I happen to think she’s honest and intelligent (and courageous for not aborting her baby as many would have) and I hope if chosen and elected that McCain will swiftly kick the bucket so we can have a better President.


43 posted on 05/29/2008 8:50:36 AM PDT by Impy (Hey Media, where are the tears for Mary Jo Kopechne?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Impy
What would you call those women and effete male journalists who fawned over Hillary’s “honest show of heartfelt emotion” if not stupid?

I would call them misguided at best, self-deluded at the worst. The fact is, the Clintons are notorious for pulling every clever emotional trick in the book, Bill is like a surgeon with a scalpel, Hiliarly is like a mad gorilla with a chainsaw, but there are always gullible types of *both* genders who will fall for such crapola.

In fact I do feel contempt for these ignorant “swing voters” of both genders who unfortunately hold the fate of the country in their hands. They care about image not substance, if Palin presents an image attractive to these tools that’s a good thing.

I see your point. My concern however, would be that such voters, if they are that shallow, are unreliable and will abandon Palin or any visually appealing conservative candidate for the next "pretty face" that comes along.

I happen to think she’s honest and intelligent (and courageous for not aborting her baby as many would have) and I hope if chosen and elected that McCain will swiftly kick the bucket so we can have a better President.

Hey, it happened to William Henry Harrison!
44 posted on 05/29/2008 9:08:21 AM PDT by mkjessup (Romania had the Ceausescus, America has the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson