Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mascot Politics (Thomas Sowell)
Townhall.com ^ | May 27, 2008 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 05/26/2008 9:07:54 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: wbill

In order to keep from being tripped up by “diversity police”, HR departments should assign a number to the resume, and omit the name.


21 posted on 05/27/2008 7:16:37 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Yes, this “typical white racist” would vote for Sowell in a heartbeat!!


22 posted on 05/27/2008 7:34:44 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

Both Barack Hussein Obama and his wife, Michelle, are obviously beneficiaries of affirmative action policies. If one takes away the teleprompter, Barack Obama becomes tongue-tied, awkward, and prone to “misstatements” (at least according to the MSM). He does not appear to be quick on his feet, just like Hillary Clinton. He is a singularly unaccomplished Harvard Law graduate in terms of actually practicing law, and is only where he is by virtue of being half-black. Michelle Obama is obviously not very smart, and certainly represented a mascot to Princeton University, Harvard Law School, Winston and Strawn Law, and The University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinics. I’ve seen her senior thesis and am surprised she was able to graduate. Together, in my view, they are mascots of the shameless democrat party.


23 posted on 05/27/2008 7:52:41 AM PDT by astounded (The Democrat Party is a Clear and Present Danger to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I've worked for places that did that. There are other ways for people to get their point across..."Interests" "Clubs/Professional Organizations" and so forth.

I'm lucky in that there's not a whole lot of room for unqualified hires in IT....the "Affirmative Action" hires take place at the blunt end of the stick where the people can't do too much damage. Lots of forward-facing positions (HR, Training, Marketing) where management can point at the mascots (I *love* that term!!) and say "See how enlightened we are!"...but when it hits the fan, the people in back who get the work done are the most qualified.

I worked at a site many years ago. We had a staff of around 100 people. They were from all over the US, and every continent (except Antartica)...both sexes, gay/straight, all races and colors. A national magazine came out to interview the management team - this was back in my younger days when I got excited about things like this.

First question out of the interviewer's mouth was "What program did you use to achieve such diversity on your staff?" We managers just looked at each other...there wasn't a program. One guy spoke up and said "We just hired the most qualified people as they came in the door."

End of interview. I guess that hiring qualified people isn't news, but hiring unqualified people is.

24 posted on 05/27/2008 7:54:13 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wbill

I hear ya. I think the kid from Tuskeegee’s shortcomings were mostly in the training rather than the aptitude department. If they had hired him in in, say, reliability, he would have quickly learned the job and been a producer and eventually he could widen his horizons.


25 posted on 05/27/2008 10:49:48 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Hillary to Obama: Arkancide happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ouch.

Mr. Sowell hits the nail on the head again!


26 posted on 05/27/2008 10:55:49 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
You're right, and congrats on standing your ground. It's hard to reason with people who either won't be reasonable, or don't have any understanding of what they're messing with (like the lady in HR).

IMHO, you don't do people any favors by hiring them to do jobs for which they're not qualified (or not ready). Better to start out low and figure things out, than start out too high and be a pariah amongst your peers. I think that "Affirmative Action Hire" is one of the biggest perjoratives that I've ever heard a person called - ran into it at a 3-letter behemoth of a company that I worked at for about 5 minutes.

I'm probably the equivalent to a systems engineer in IT. I started out with a BS in EE, and I would have gotten my head handed to me if I had tried to do the job that I'm doing now. It wasn't an intelligence thing, it was an experience thing. A person needs to know how a system, or a business works, before jumping in and messing with it. Most important - they need to know "If I do 'X', then not only 'X' changes, but 'Y' changes as well". That's the biggest hurdle I see with new hires on the IT dept. They get so focused on the problem at hand that they don't realize that fixing it will (more often than not) have other ramifications....

27 posted on 05/27/2008 11:18:42 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wbill
"diversity"

Diversity is just a code name for quotas. When quota became a dirty word after the failure of affirmative discrimination excuse me action, they came up with the diversity scam. As if simply having samples of a host of different ethnic groups plus the sex equation will produce great employees. Tell that to professional sports teams.

28 posted on 05/27/2008 11:29:52 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
As if simply having samples of a host of different ethnic groups plus the sex equation will produce great employees.

Yup. Not sure if you read one of my prior posts, but I was on a *very* diverse team for a time (actually did the hiring for it). It was excellent - but that excellence came from hiring top notch people, not filling in checkboxes for various ethnicities.

I want the best employees possible working for me and with me. Call me a rebel, but if they happen to be straight white males, so be it.

29 posted on 05/27/2008 11:47:09 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Obama wants to have a national discussion about race. I say we start with this column.
As Sowell pointed out in a previous column - precisely in the context of Obama's famous speech - when a race hustler calls for "a national dialog on race," what he means is that he demands a monolog on race - in which he talks and everyone else shuts up and listens to him.

My point is that a race hustler is able to get away with that precisely to the extent that Big Journalism runs interference for him. The imposture is so utterly transparent that there would be no possible response to the dreaded "second question." The race hustler operates only so long as he knows that Big Journalism will never ask the second question but will fawn over the hustler's monolog and treat it as dispositive of all legitimate points of view on the issue.

The fraudulent, 150-year-old process which gives Big Journalism the motive and opportunity to do that is demystified here.


30 posted on 05/27/2008 1:21:39 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vince2285

Ping


31 posted on 05/27/2008 1:36:38 PM PDT by jan in Colorado (For Barack Hussein Obama TRUTH FILE see my homepage! Research this impostor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I read this earlier today. Great piece by Sowell.

15 years and millions of dollars in revenue after proving myself an asset to my company, they wanted to give me money as a diverse employee for business development for being a minority....

I was insulted. I did this on my own. So I did the honorable thing and told them what they could do with their money....

Deposit it in my account and thanked them.


32 posted on 05/27/2008 4:36:11 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Sounds to me like the only reasonable thing to do! :-)


33 posted on 05/27/2008 4:48:28 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

I can see how that would be offensive, but it’s also pretty silly. Makes you wonder what goes on in some craniums. You did the right thing. At least you had plenty of time to prove yourself before that happened.


34 posted on 05/27/2008 5:15:14 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Rocky

It reminded me of the final scene from “Arthur” the 1980 movie.

“I’m not f*&^ing stupid, I took the money.”


35 posted on 05/27/2008 5:41:50 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Using human beings as mascots is not idealism. It is self-aggrandizement that is ugly in both its concept and its consequences.


36 posted on 05/27/2008 7:42:33 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson