[Principled]

She’s dead, Jim.

[reasonisfaith]

Hillary Clinton flashes her deadly fangs.

[Revolting cat!]

And there are defenders of her here! Also, reports say she’d done it more than once. It is deliberate. It is an intimidation tactic. Psyching the opponent out. These two Arkie grifters are cynical operators, and they plan their moves deliberately.

[ken21]

if democrats can’t see that hillary’s transparent,

they’re blind.

[swampdweller]

You’ve got to be kidding me? Why don’t she just hang a target on Obama?

[BunnySlippers]

It should stir an uproar. There is no one who would more have an audacity to hope for a result that Hillary had the nerve to suggest.

[AmericanDave]

and Obamas safety is even more at risk if Hillary IS his VP!

[6SJ7]

Obama know he’s in real trouble when Hillary keeps referring to him as ‘Vince’.

[johniegrad]

This was calculating and exacting. She said exactly what she wanted to say and the timing was directly related to Teddy’s illness. Extremely cynical but yet intentional.

[woofie]

I have been busy today and I missed a lot of this but I caught the discussuion on Brit Hume ... so I just went to DU to see what they were doing.... talk about a meltdown

[Rockitz]

I view this as a calculated slip of the tongue designed to deflect blame when the Clinton machine actually does carry out the assassination of Barack Obama so that Hillary can claim the Democratic nomination laer this summer. If they can bring down Ron Brown's plane in Croatia, they can pull this off too.

Never underestimate the resourcefulness of the Clinton machine when power is at stake.

[doc1019]

Not to defend the wicked witch of the left … I do think that her explanation as to what she meant is perfectly within reason.

[Rocko]

An uproar from many of the same people who chuckle at GWB assassination jokes.

[Bender2]

[RDTF]

Arkancide dreams!

[vetvetdoug]

If I were Obama, I'd stay at home with the curtains closed on the 6th of June.

[maine-iac7]

That dominated the news - while Marxine Waters slip of the tongue that let the liberal's Communist cat out of the bag with the threat of "Socializing" = ah, ooops, ah, um, "taking over" the Oil companies = get nary a mention - or if so, so short shrift, I missed it.

Which remark do you think was the most dangerous for America? I would think the threat of Nationalizing American businesses would have sent a collective (wrong word?) chill down everyone's spine. But it's being ignored. Why? Could it be because the media is in bed with them?

[harpo11]

Hillary Clinton is the most intentionally divisive, slimy, crass, lying lowlife political hack that we have had the unfortunate experience to see and be thrust upon us for over 16 years and she still doesn't get it.

What's she not getting is that the world has changed and sadly she still is fighting the battles of the 60's with the same old and tired out senseless rhetoric.

Whatever excuse, blame, or desire she wishes to propose as reasons for her continuance, tribulations and/or failures is a result of other circumstances other than the truth which is the product, herself.

This week alone we have heard such extreme examples of desperation, the voters are sexist, the voters are racist, hard working white people vote for me, the failure to seat Michigan and Florida delegates is the same as granting women the right to vote, or freeing the slaves, and if it doesn't happen it would be tantamount to what has been happening with the election in Zimbabwe. As ridiculous as she sounds these things can be almost forgiven.

However, her reference today to Robert Kennedy's assassination in June 40 years ago, and this is not the first time she has said these things, is not forgiveable.

The remembered and heartbreaking images her icily reckless words invokes are horrific and for those of us who were very young at that volatile time in our history cringe at her carelessly ghoulish statement especially when her democrat opponent has already received according to the media several threats.

I cannot read her mind, but I can hear her words and see her face as she uttered such profane and vile words and she did not appear to react at all, she remained quite comfortable in her explanation, as if it were perfectly normal for her to think in such terms and have thought these thoughts as reasons for her to continue on in the primary race just in case.

Mrs. Clinton you are not fit to serve in the highest elected office of our great nation.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

I still say that making this an "issue" is nothing more than a weapon, a smear, against Senator Clinton. It's what leftist do, even among themselves. But 999 percent of the time these "issues" weapons are launched at conservatives hourly around the clock.

Now the Nytimen (a fellow Freeper used the more descriptive clinical term, Nytwits, the other day) opine that Mrs. Clinton raised "concern for Mr. Obama’s safety."

(That is one of those "issues" weapons aimed at conservatives; it was the "issue" of conservatives physically harming Senator Obama that was raised by the Left to smear conservatives -- including by the Nytwits, I bet.)

Nytimese is difficult for me to interpret but Obama’s safety does seem to be the argument against Senator Clinton.

Given that it was a Clinton who referenced the murder I can see the point.

[exit82]

This is media driven, and the media is in the tank for Obama. Obama sees an enemy behind every tree. McCain and Hillary should start questioning Obama’s mental state for being so paranoid. Everything is about him or an attack on him, even the President’s speech in the Knesset.

Listen, this is a Friday flash in the pan. Forgotten by Monday. The media will fan the fires on the Sunday shows, but this will be replaced by something else by next week.

Hillary will be the nominee. Obama will beg to be the VP by the time she is through with him at the convention.

Pass the popcorn.