It means nothing more than she wants to stay in the race as long as she can. To scandalize this is to have an agenda and to be willing to lie to acheive it. History is history. Why is she bad for citing history? There is nothing in what she said that implied she was hoping it happened, would help it happen, thought there was a greater chance it would happen to Obama....nothing! Before that comment she mentioned billy boy didn't have the nomination sewed up until the middle of June. Anything can happen. That was her only point.
This bugs me because it reminds me of our own primary. Where is the respect for the rules of engagement and the will of the people, including the time it takes to get every state's opinion on the candidates?