Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usmcobra
by his standard every country that was ever punished by lost territory should wage war to get it back if the new owners of said property don’t negotiate to get it back.

Pat states this prescription exactly where?

44 posted on 05/21/2008 8:42:23 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

So was he is using some other bench mark for why Hitler was right to invade besides the Danzig corridor?

By his standard If the Peace treaty that put Danzig in Poland was illegal because it didn’t conform to Wilson’s 14 points, then what I said is what he is trying to prove.

Pat has just made every treaty ever signed after a war null and void if the losing side doesn’t agree to the terms, or can find some one that doesn’t agree to the terms for them.

The next thing you know he will be encouraging the British to retake the east coast as their lost 13 colonies since the treaty of Paris was never signed by the United States Government.


53 posted on 05/21/2008 9:00:35 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson