1. Well, their expectations turned out to be wrong didn't they? And for all your trumped up sophisticated eduction - in your mind - you cannot read. Anyone with any understanding of militaries and diplomacy at that time would have known that France and England did not have the force to back up that promise. Pat's point - because, in addition to not being able to read you cannot think - is that such guarantees are often worthless and counting on them can turn out to be a disaster. He is telling Bush not to make them, and telling Israel not to count on them. In your rush to attack PAT you completely forget that there is a 50% chance that in 6 months the President of the US will not feel bound by Bush's word of honor.
2. Resistance helped everywhere and we honor the brave men and women who lived and died resisting the occupation, everywhere. But the resistance did not defeat the Nazis. The mass armies of the US and Russia were required. Yes others helped and helped honorably, but it was total warfare as Clausewitz called such things.
3. The Poles were treated very harshly indeed by the Soviets. Perhaps they would have been treated worse as Nazi collaborators, but perhaps not.
What you and your silly little immoral historical fantasizers forget is that the Nazi war machine was incredibly formidible, and it took the combined armies of enormous industrial powers to defeat it. Asking folks who had no real power to stand up to the Nazis to turn themselves into Nazi tank fodder with little of strategic value to the war to show for it is immoral.