To: rmlew
The Poles were not about to follow the same fate after giving up their only seaport. Except Danzig was never a Polish city in the first place.
195 posted on
05/22/2008 3:48:44 PM PDT by
Hacksaw
(I support the San Fran tiger.)
To: Hacksaw
Except Danzig was never a Polish city in the first place. (There are plenty of historical references on the web that you can look up yourself.)
196 posted on
05/22/2008 3:56:11 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(I'll pray for celebrities as soon as they start praying for me!)
To: Hacksaw
I wrote:
The Poles were not about to follow the same fate after giving up their only seaport.
Except Danzig was never a Polish city in the first place.
Is that a joke? Danzig was founded by Polish King Mieszko I in the 10th century. Even after 1308, when the Teutonic Order siezed the city, it, like the rest of Royal Prussia was part still under Polish authority. It only became Prussian-German in 1793 and part of Germany in 1871.
Legally, Danzig was a Free City under joining Polish-League of Nations administration. It wasn't German. Ethnically, Danzig was German, but if that is the guide, then most of Prussia was Polish or at least Slavicized Balt.
200 posted on
05/22/2008 5:13:03 PM PDT by
rmlew
(Down with the ersatz immanentization of the eschaton known as Globalism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson