Pat would be blaming the girl for her own murder and the murder of her family, if you want to use an analogy.
So, you conclude, based upon my language, explaining why the rapist murdered the girl, that I have justified the rapist. Funny thing because this is what prosecutor's have to explain every day. If the rapist murdered the girl because she refused to negotiate his demands, he is guilty of first degree murder and goes to the gas chamber. If a man murders a girl because he is insane, he escapes conviction and goes to the insane asylum. So, what you call justification is in fact the required premeditation for a conviction of murder.
And yours is the kind of logic upon which the conservative cause is supposed to depend?