Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Non FLDS family members are coming forward to take custody of some of the children. In the normal course of events, when kids are taken away from parent(s), family members get first shot at assuming responsibility for the kids.
1 posted on 05/21/2008 5:50:15 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Saundra Duffy

They could not tell a 27 year old from a minor?


2 posted on 05/21/2008 5:51:19 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Saundra Duffy

So . . . the authorities were holding adult women virtual prisoners.


3 posted on 05/21/2008 5:51:31 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Saundra Duffy

What you have is a collection of people who cannot or will not categorically state who’s kids belong to which parents and how old they are. Either because they no longer know for sure themselves or they are afraid that if they do state it they’ll go to jail for molestation and statutory rape. That is unconscionable to me.

And yet some blame the state of Texas for not figuring it out right the first time. Kudos to Texas for trying. Now hang em high.


19 posted on 05/21/2008 6:28:58 PM PDT by festus (Tagline removed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Saundra Duffy

Why do I get the feeling that you Mormons would like nothing better than for your FLDS brothers to simply get back to getting after new teen wives and having a herd of women?

The case is NOT weakening. Some of the people who have lied about numerous things are actually turning out to not be minors. That is the whole reason for the case hearings. BIG DEAL. When it turns out that no Polygamy sexual perversion was happening, then you will have a point. And you Mormons can have a victory dance.


32 posted on 05/21/2008 6:46:47 PM PDT by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Saundra Duffy

You forgot to add that there were 26 women/children who had age disputes 9 issues have been resolved.
Its difficult to resolve these issues where there is habitual lying within the group (according to other news reports).

“Only 17 women, out of original 26, are left in the state’s disputed-age group”


35 posted on 05/21/2008 6:50:59 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Saundra Duffy
family members get first shot at assuming responsibility for the kids.

Something we agree on. This whole case is sad and for the sake of the children, I hope all ends well. That would mean that if abuse is proven that the abusers are punished. If there are responsible non abusing parents, that they get their kids back.

let's pray for all those involved and that justice is served.

47 posted on 05/21/2008 7:04:10 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Saundra Duffy

I hope this is not another thread defending the sicko people who were sexually abusing young girls.

Follow the law and deal with these sick people.

These pro polygamy threads make conservatives look like ignorant buffoons


87 posted on 05/21/2008 7:48:39 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson