[the anti-liberal]

"That statement was made as a vision of where we would be after four years of a McCain administration, wasn't it?"

Perhaps that's correct, yet begs the question - what does it mean to him to have the border "under control"?

And yes, that woman has no place in the White House. I suspect he's just trying to appear 'with-it' and 'not-sexist' by having her there - in other words, she's there because she's a woman, kinda like B. Hussein is only there because he's black (even though he's only 4% black and 42% Arab, but I digress).

[calcowgirl]

...what does it mean to him to have the border "under control"?

Doncha know? He'd have the "border state governors" "Certify" that the borders are secure. You know--kinda like when Arnold tells Californians the budget is "balanced."

I'm sure we can rely on Richardson, Perry, Napolitano and Arnold to do the right thing. /s

And yes, that woman has no place in the White House. I suspect he's just trying to appear 'with-it' and 'not-sexist' by having her there - in other words, she's there because she's a woman...

The GOP has a destructive streak--they don't think they can sell ideas and favor "celebrity" candidates these days. Unfortunately, Carly is a self-promoting disaster. There are plenty of good women out there but somehow they'd probably choose Martha Stewart before lifting a finger to go out and actually recruit some qualified folks that believe in conservatism and/or the Republican platform.