Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: puroresu

Sorry, that was dumb of me.... I meant to ask if the CA court was referring to the CA constitution or the US Constitution...??


566 posted on 05/16/2008 10:04:29 PM PDT by DrewsMum (Hey Barrrrack...grow a set! -Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies ]


To: DrewsMum

It was allegedly based on the California constitution. I say allegedly, of course, because the four judge majority in this case deliberately and knowingly ruled incorrectly. There is no actual provision of the state constitution which supports any so-called right to same-sex “marriage”.


567 posted on 05/16/2008 10:46:30 PM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson