You’ve been nice to me. Ha. I bet you really believe it, too!
You seem to be under the delusion that all my posts are directed at you. As you’ll see if you look back, another poster suggested he or she was giving up on the United States and would rather live under Muslim rule.
Public schools are secular entities, as they should be. Do you really disagree with that? Do you want the state promoting yours, or anyone else’s religion?
I understand now you’re not capable of posting without personal insults and namecalling, and that takes up a lot of space, but making a little room for common sense would do you good.
Liberalism is a mental illness and you Ms Mommy are ill.
As you’ll see if you look back, another poster suggested he or she was giving up on the United States and would rather live under Muslim rule.
Get real. Your post was to me. Here's the relevant idiocy:
"And do you really believe it’s the job of the public schools to “preach religion”? Why would any religious person want that kind of state interference in the first place? And which religion would you have the public schools preach? Scientology? Islam? Buddhism? A little of everything?It is no wonder religious/social conservatives are losing so many battles with arguments like this. Egads.
This idiocy addressed to me was in reply to this statement by me:
"When the state, in this case 4 small folks in black robes, puts it's imprimatur on homosexual marriage then the state requires that public schools treat homosexual unions and heterosexual unions as equivalent. This is called indoctrination. It is just another case of the secularists imposing their views on the religionists using the unlimited power of the state. I'll make you a urge your side from preaching secularism in public schools and I'll urge my side not to preach religion in public schools. Then you, me and the First Amendment are all happy."
Public schools are secular entities, as they should be. Do you really disagree with that? Do you want the state promoting yours, or anyone else’s religion?
Idiocy. Which, btw, is not an ad hominem attack. Your reply to the above statement is sheer idiocy, idiocy being descriptive of your statement, not you. You may be a very nice TraditionalMommy but your idiotic rant and then your attempt to weasel out by claiming you were addressing somebody else doesn't speak well of you one would think.
I understand now you’re not capable of posting without personal insults and namecalling, and that takes up a lot of space, but making a little room for common sense would do you good.
And I understand that you, like many others I've debated this topic with, have a close relationship with folks who happen to be homosexual. Thus you are willing to throw a couple of hundred years worth of American jurisprudence out the window along with common sense, logic and our constitutional republic in order to support them.
Loyalty is an admirable quality. Let's leave it there.