If you're so interested in families, campaign to outlaw divorce and single parents.
The rest of your post is nonsense. In fact, do what you want, I'm through with you.
Well, there's the rub...the question is whether it's "unnecessary" or not. I say it is necessary, not only because it would be so damaging, but because we're legalizing something that can't exist. That's not going to work out well.
If you're so interested in families, campaign to outlaw divorce and single parents.
1. DING-DING-DING! I knew it was only a matter of time before that chestnut came up! Yes, because we have stupid heterosexuals ruining their lives, we shouldn't worry that we could possibly make it worse. No, really, now that we've moved from the brick house to the stick house, it's sanctimoious to say it's a bad idea to move to the straw house. Fine reasoning there.
2. Are you saying that the citizenry has the sovereign right to outlaw divorce and single parenting? Wouldn't that imply that you believe that outlawing these things is necessary? A strange view...
The rest of your post is nonsense. In fact, do what you want, I'm through with you.
Wait...I'm confused. Are you saying it's nonsense that Leo Childs, Scott Brockie, Ake Green, Scott Savage, Crystal Dixon, and Ene Kiildi all had their basic freedoms assaulted by the gay rights crowd, or are you saying it's nonsense for the people of California to outlaw polygamy and incest?
And if you're so much more correct and devoted to freedom than a sanctimonious sort like me, shouldn't you have an answer for that? Especially the part about the folks who got the Gaystapo treatment? After all, it appears that their pursuit of happiness was unnecessarily restricted.