Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: californianmom
Depends upon what statutes and/or constitutional issues they are addressing - I haven't seen the opinion yet but this quotation suggests they are relying upon an interpretation of the "equal protection clause" of the 14th Amendment (US Constitution), unless CA also has an equal protection clause that they are referring to??

"the interest in retaining the traditional and well-established definition of marriage — cannot properly be viewed as a compelling state interest for purposes of the equal protection clause, or as necessary to serve such an interest."
30 posted on 05/15/2008 10:19:10 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama: My 1930s Foreign Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Social Policy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante

Yes the ruling is referencing CA equal protection clause.


473 posted on 05/16/2008 6:42:21 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson