[PugetSoundSoldier]

But isn't the idea of free market anarchy wonderful? To let it evolve organically?

It's not Constitutional. And I thought your whole point was that Paul was "a staunch Constitutionalist" and that McCain was a socialist, against the original Constitution when it comes to the economy...

Apparently now it's that you wish Paul was an anarchist, and that the Constitution didn't contain the language that it actually does?

Did you just toke a bad bowl?

[Stevieboy]

But isn't the idea of free market anarchy wonderful? To let it evolve organically?

It's not Constitutional. And I thought your whole point was that Paul was "a staunch Constitutionalist" and that McCain was a socialist, against the original Constitution when it comes to the economy... Apparently now it's that you wish Paul was an anarchist, and that the Constitution didn't contain the language that it actually does? Did you just toke a bad bowl?

Easy on the snipes, I genuinely want nothing but freedom and liberty and fairness for all - and I don't belive in being a slave (that's it, nothing more)

So tell me how does being a believer in the great U.S. Constitution differ from that of being a pure free-market proponent?