To: GSWarrior
In the old days, someone like this molester would have been told to leave town, and, if he did not promptly comply, the next visit would have involved more than words. The current system of monitoring released sex perverts defies reason. Neither police nor watch groups can be present all the time. He will strike as soon as he feels he can get away with it. If the laws do not provide for their permanent exclusion from society, extralegal action against these perverts is justified.
To: Wallace T.
Without knowing the details of the sex offender's previous crime, it seems likely that he is a candidate to re-offend. This is a small town and his every movement is no doubt under a magnifying glass. I'd wager that if he were to re-offend he would likely head to a large city where he is an unknown.
It's not a good situation.
12 posted on
05/09/2008 10:10:22 AM PDT by
GSWarrior
(Proudly posting band-width consuming images since 2000)
To: Wallace T.
In the old days, someone like this molester would have been told
to leave town, and, if he did not promptly comply, the next visit
would have involved more than words.
It makes one wonder if the reason you have a really nice, safe
small town...then crime-ridden town a few miles away...
doesn't have something to do with a covert "vigilance" committee.
That quietly does the sort of "dis-invitation" work that cops can't
legally do.
16 posted on
05/09/2008 10:21:45 AM PDT by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson