“I did read it.”
Ok...if you read this:
“went inside the home for a moment”
why did you say this:
“turned her back for a few seconds”
These two things arent even close to being the same thing...
“Knowing most parents though..she must have thought the child was in a safe area and not expecting wolves.”
Clearly...and clearly...she was quite wrong...her child was NOT in a safe area.
“We must do everything we can to keep our kids safe but we shouldn’t bubble wrap them either though.”
I didnt say that...I said she was wrong to leave her child alone..outside...
Not sure why you wish to argue the point when the result is clear....her child was attacked by a coyote because her child was beyond her direct supervision while she went in the house.
It would add insult to injury...but she could be brought up on charges of reckless endangerment.
You dont leave a two year old outside alone...even for a second.
Considering that coyote attacks had already happened twice before in the past few days...