“That the State can seize and transfer custody of children en masse prior to individual hearings, apparently without any restraint whatsoever, other than a rubber stamp judge who helped set the whole farce in motion is prima facie evidence of how dangerously vague CPS laws are.”
If you look at her experience, and qualifications, you will see that she is nothing of the kind.
I have, however, read an almost EXACT copy of the statement you used, on one of the Anarchy/Free the FLDS websites.
Anyway, when you base your conclusions on invalid premises, your conclusions are the same. Invalid.
Then they are either plagarizing my writing or coming up with the same notions independently. I have never been to that site or any such site, and I did not get what I wrote from anyone else. If you meant to insinuate that I am plagarizing them, then you should retract it.
If you look at her experience, and qualifications, you will see that she is nothing of the kind.
What percentage of CPS actions or decisions do you think are ever overruled by a judge? I don't know, but I suspect that they are few and far between. I guess that might mean that CPS decisions and actions are almost always right, or it could mean that there are not sufficent restraints on State powers in a CYA system of justice via a single judge.
Cordially,