Skip to comments.
Let Lauren Live!
ChristtheKingMaine ^
| May 7, 2008
| Judie Brown
Posted on 05/08/2008 3:14:03 AM PDT by 8mmMauser
LAUREN RICHARDSON - YOU CAN HELP!
By Judie Brown
It has been a source of ongoing sadness to read of the difficulties Lauren Richardson’s father has had over the course of the past several months. For those of you who are not familiar with her case, Lauren overdosed on heroin on August 28, 2006. She suffered oxygen deprivation and, as a result of the overdose, is now in a coma and unable to speak out for herself. At the time of the overdose, Lauren was expecting a baby. Her parents honored what they knew would have been her wish and did all they could to keep her healthy and comfortable until the child was born. Today, though Lauren may not be aware of it, she is the mother of Ember Grace, who was born in February 2007.
Since the birth of her daughter, Lauren remains unable to speak of her concerns, but she has a loving father who is doing all he can to protect her from suffering the same fate as Terri Schiavo. However, Lauren’s mother, who has been named her legal guardian, is sadly not of the same opinion and is working with attorneys to pressure the courts to permit Lauren’s starvation.
Lauren’s father has kept hope alive, even at times when there appeared to be no hope in human terms. Lauren’s father is a man of hope in Christ and is dedicated to spending every breath he has on defending Lauren, regardless of what it might cost him in physical exhaustion and worldly goods. The most recent update for those concerned about Lauren tells us the following:
We struggle at times as we seek to share with the public the details of what is happening with Lauren because of the disagreement we have with Lauren’s mother. We cannot understand her reasoning in refusing a path of hope, healing and restoration for Lauren and insisting on causing her death by withholding food and water from her. The issue in Lauren’s case is the eternal truth that all people, no matter what their medical condition, bear the image of God and deserve basic care and an opportunity to be restored to health.
Bobby Schindler, Terri Schiavo’s brother, has written about Lauren in an editorial earlier this year, "False Compassion," and is working closely with Lauren’s father in order to provide expertise that he is uniquely qualified to share during a trying time like this.
There are many links on the Life for Lauren web site that will assist you in tracking this case and learning who is supporting Lauren’s ongoing care and who is opposing it. More importantly, there is something you can do to express your concerns.
ACTION NEEDED NOW
The governor of Delaware, Ruth Ann Minner, is being asked by pro-life Americans across this nation to intervene in this case in order to save Lauren from what many fear is an imminent court order dictating that Lauren be starved and dehydrated to death. I am asking you to be one of those who communicates your passionate belief that Lauren’s life is sacred and deserves to be protected from those who would order her death. The governor’s e-mail address is governor.minner@state.de.us.
Further, it would mean a great deal to Lauren’s father, Randy, if you sent him a copy of your e-mail to Governor Ruth Ann Minner. Randy’s e-mail address is Lifeforlauren@aol.com.
During a recent visit to Anchorage, Alaska where Bobby Schindler was invited to speak, he told a reporter from The Catholic Anchor, "Once we accept that killing is an acceptable answer to human suffering, we lose any type of parameters. Euthanasia is a form of abandonment. It is not compassion."
Truer words were never spoken. As I frequently tell people who argue that we pro-lifers are being heartless and cruel for fighting to defend the rights of a "hopeless case," "God is the author of every human being’s life, and He has never given permission to a single one of us to arbitrarily rob another human being of life for any reason including disability or illness."
As Flannery O’Connor once wrote on the subject of false compassion, "In the absence of faith, we govern by tenderness. And tenderness leads to the gas chamber."
Lauren Richardson is not terminal – she is severely disabled. Lauren Richardson should not be murdered.
Judie Brown is president of American Life League and a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charliecrist; googling; johnmccain; justsayno2johnmccain; lauren; moralabsolutes; prolife; richardson; schiavo; terridailies; vp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,521-1,523 next last
To: 8mmMauser
At the time of the overdose, Lauren was expecting a baby
WTFO? doing heroin while pregnant is generally not a good idea.
All in all, she is screwed. Schiavo set the precedent, is it just a matter of how many billable hours the lawyers can rack up.
To: wafflehouse
No it was not a great idea after all the months of being clean, but was it worth a death sentence by long, slow dehydration?
Yes, the Schiavo killing team tried to set a precedent with Terri and are trying again with Lauren. I know of no criminals guilty of drug use sentenced to a similar execution to that which might be reserved for Lauren. Personally, I don’t like it when the State can allow such executions and billable hours or not I will rail against it if it happens in America, the country I love.
42
posted on
05/09/2008 3:14:55 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: 8mmMauser
let me be clear here. I was absolutely against the murder of Terry Schiavo. I am against the murder of this poor girl as well. However i have no doubt that they will kill this girl in the end.
We are not mixing the subject with our posting of abortion topics. It is all but different markers on the same slide of the spectrum. The death dealers are of the same specie regardless of preference.
.................................
I never said that a bill requiring Colorado abortionists to offer an ultrasound to women, “would have done nothing to stop women from getting abortions” (“Abortion sides agree,” The Gazette, Feb. 12; “Corrections,” The Gazette, March 1). Of course such a law would have the possibility of saving the lives of some precious children.
Colorado Right to Life opposes every law that regulates the killing of unborn children because regardless of the intention, such laws violate God’s enduring command, “Do not murder,” because they merely prune the abortion weed and strengthen its root, because such laws make abortion seem more palatable to the public and to politicians, because our conservative judges who uphold such laws become increasingly hostile to the right to life of the unborn and because if Roe v. Wade is overturned, such laws will keep abortion legal in Colorado because they end with the meaning, “and then you can kill the baby.”
Joe Riccobono
President, Colorado Right to Life
Denver
SAVE THE CHILDREN... Regulating abortions doesnt end the practice
8mm
44
posted on
05/09/2008 3:28:28 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: wafflehouse
Thanks, wafflehouse. I don’t want to read it wrong and apologize if it sounded as such. They sure as hell succeeded with Terri and are on their way to a largely unopposed success with Lauren. It is hugely important to them although not so deeply impassioning to the public eye.
As it stands for now, I agree, they are on the path to success.
45
posted on
05/09/2008 3:33:35 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
In this essay by Rebecca Messall, genocide is examined. Because of its length, I excerpted it, hoping interested visitors will follow the link and read it in entirety.
...............................
Believing abortion is a stand-alone issue is like believing egg yolks appear by themselves without egg whites, shells, and male and female chickens. My greatest mistake as a pro-life person was in thinking Roe v. Wade arrived by itself. I didn't want to link abortion to other controversial subjects, which scared or confused me, detracting from the obvious atrocity of butchering a living, unborn child. Because of my narrow focus, I ignored the horrific world-view and the socio-political-financial machinery fueling abortion.
While reading the newspaper in May 1999, I noticed a headline about an evolution controversy occupying the Kansas State Board of Education. I flipped the page without reading the story. Like many pro-life people, I felt that the origin of the species was a matter of God's choice of methods--but not a pro-life concern. Busy in local pro-life matters, I believed evolution was an "education dispute," a controversy I could, gratefully, sit out. When a metro-area newspaper reporter sought my opinion on the proposed science standards, my cautious response was, having not read them, to remind the reporter that evolution in the wrong hands had supported the bloodiest regimes in history. The reporter urged me to read the science standards, assuring me there was "nothing to offend."
I did read them, and went on to research the history and content of the "national science education standards," a national model on which the Kansas science standards are based. I realized that evolution by natural selection has been the fundamental pro-life issue since Darwin himself. His argument that biologically inferior people threaten to deprive intellectually superior people of food and resources established a scientific-sounding rationale for genocide, which is used today by the abortion-based population control and family planning establishments, as well as others bent to this day on improving the race by laboratory methods.
I contacted the reporter, and gave her some disturbing preliminary research to pursue about the groups involved with the science standards, in the belief that she would do investigative research, whereas I would continue my humble attempt to prevent abortions through our agency's maternity home, and likewise help people recover from the anguish of abortion aftermath through our post-abortion counseling.
But the reporter rebuffed me. So, perceiving the newspaper's political commitments were set in concrete, I decided to document some basic information. The facts bear directly not only on my day-to-day efforts against the culture of death; they also concern public policy matters in science education, "family planning" and a host of issues about which the public has the right to know, and the duty to make right.
In 1871, Darwin argued that Thomas Robert Malthus' earlier theory of scarcity was the mechanism that drove human evolutionary "progress." In his book, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Darwin wrote:1..........................................
"The Evolution of Genocide"
8mm
46
posted on
05/09/2008 3:40:40 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
Is Lauren PVS, or does she show adequate evidence for PVS to give good reason to snuff her? Thaddeus Mason Pope has a fine blog on Medical Futility and here is what he says:
....................................
Several people have recently urged me to consider studies demonstrating the error rates in diagnosing PVS. While I have yet to do so, I did notice this appellate opinion published yesterday in Wisconsin, and briefly reported by the Chicago Tribune.
In 2000, Tywanda Luckett suffered permanent severe brain damage allegedly due to medical malpractice. In a damages action brought in 2003, one of the defendants asked the plaintiffs to admit that Tywanda was in a PVS and that the PVS was permanent. Plaintiffs made those admissions. Presumably both treating physicians and/or retained experts had reached this conclusion. Notably, plaintiff's counsel made the admissions knowing that they would substantially reduce the value of the case both for the plaintiffs and for himself.
In preparing for trial, plaintiffs' counsel found doctor's notes stating that, in 2001, Tywanda could "follow simply commands," "comprehend some of what is said to her," and is "aware" and "responsive." Since such evidence strongly suggests that Tywanda was not in PVS, counsel sought to withdraw the admission. The trial court allowed this and the appellate court affirmed, even though Tywanda is now deceased and defendants cannot examine her. Consequently, the value of the case has now changed dramatically with the addition of five years of pain and suffering damages.
Posted by Thaddeus Mason Pope at 12:48 PM Misdiagnosing PVS
8mm
47
posted on
05/09/2008 3:48:00 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
More from Professor Pope...
........................
With the end of classes, I am catching up on some reading. I just read this article from the February 8, 2007 New England Journal of Medicine. Curlin et al. show that "14% of patients -- more than 40 million Americans may be cared for by physicians who do not believe they are obligated to disclose information about medically available treatments they consider objectionable."
I find this troubling. While futility policies (and laws) are aimed at enabling providers to avoid providing treatment they deem ethically or professionally inappropriate, those policies and laws always inform the patient/surrogate and allow the opportunity to transfer. The objective is to allow specific providers to decline to provide some treatments, not to altogether prohibit the patient from getting the treatment. The objective is to allow providers to extricate themselves from the administration of interventions.
But Curlin et al.'s study suggests that many physicians' refusals look more like evangelism or proselytism. They never even mention some alternatives (even life-preserving or life-sustaining alternatives). Therefore, these physicians' patients/surrogates do not even know to look for a transfer or to seek review.
Posted by Thaddeus Mason Pope at 1:07 PM Conscience and Gags
8mm
48
posted on
05/09/2008 3:55:58 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; amdgmary
Sophie Scholl is a martyr of NAZI Germany few have heard about, but her story is set. A movie has been made also of her story. We find it so applicable to Terri Schiavo's case and cases like Lauren that we have adopted her cry and symbol as our own.
"We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest."
.......................
Executed by the 3rd Reich, Sophie
and her pals sought to awaken awareness to the plight of the Jews.
Their campus distribution of controversial pamphlets cost them their lives.
Meanwhile, in the U.S., the majority applaud the euthanasia movement, bought and paid for by George Soros (PDIA,) which starves and dehydrates the disabled, when they can't speak for themselves.
Is America today really much different from Hitler's murderous regime?
Posted by Leslie at 9:22 AM DOES AMERICA HAVE ANY SOPHIE SCHOLLS?
8mm
49
posted on
05/09/2008 4:10:27 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
50
posted on
05/09/2008 4:15:24 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All
We keep watch.....
51
posted on
05/09/2008 4:26:15 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
Who lives, who dies, who decides? I am not sure I would pass the test to step out of line to the death chambers, even without catching the disease.
...................................
By LINDSEY TANNER AP Medical Writer
Article Last Updated: 05/05/2008 07:48:18 AM MDT
CHICAGO—Doctors know some patients needing lifesaving care won't get it in a flu pandemic or other disaster. The gut-wrenching dilemma will be deciding who to let die.
Now, an influential group of physicians has drafted a grimly specific list of recommendations for which patients wouldn't be treated. They include the very elderly, seriously hurt trauma victims, severely burned patients and those with severe dementia.
The suggested list was compiled by a task force whose members come from prestigious universities, medical groups, the military and government agencies. They include the Department of Homeland Security, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services.
The proposed guidelines are designed to be a blueprint for hospitals "so that everybody will be thinking in the same way" when pandemic flu or another widespread health care disaster hits, said Dr. Asha Devereaux. She is a critical care specialist in San Diego and lead writer of the task force report.
The idea is to try to make sure that scarce resources—including ventilators, medicine and doctors and nurses—are used in a uniform, objective way, task force members said.
Their recommendations appear in a report appearing Monday in the May edition of Chest, the medical journal of the American College of Chest Physicians.
"If a mass casualty critical care event were to occur tomorrow, many people with clinical conditions that are survivable under usual health care system conditions may have to forgo life-sustaining interventions owing to deficiencies in supply or staffing," the report states.
To prepare, hospitals should designate a triage team with the Godlike task of deciding who will and who won't get lifesaving care, the task force wrote. Those out of luck are the people at high risk of death and a slim chance of long-term survival. But the recommendations get much more specific, and include:
—People older than 85.
—Those with severe trauma, which could include critical injuries from car crashes and shootings.
—Severely burned patients older than 60.
—Those with severe mental impairment, which could include advanced Alzheimer's disease.
—Those with a severe chronic disease, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease or poorly controlled diabetes.
Dr. Kevin Yeskey, director of the preparedness and emergency operations office at the Department of Health and Human Services, was on the task force. He said the report would be among many the agency reviews as part of preparedness efforts.
Public health law expert Lawrence Gostin of Georgetown University called the report an important initiative but also "a political minefield and a legal minefield."
The recommendations would probably violate federal laws against age discrimination and disability discrimination, said Gostin, who was not on the task force.
If followed to a tee, such rules could exclude care for the poorest, most disadvantaged citizens who suffer disproportionately from chronic disease and disability, he said. While health care rationing will be necessary in a mass disaster, "there are some real ethical concerns here."
James Bentley, a senior vice president at American Hospital Association, said the report will give guidance to hospitals in shaping their own preparedness plans even if they don't follow all the suggestions.
He said the proposals resemble a battlefield approach in which limited health care resources are reserved for those most likely to survive.
Bentley said it's not the first time this type of approach has been recommended for a catastrophic pandemic, but that "this is the most detailed one I have seen from a professional group."
While the notion of rationing health care is unpleasant, the report could help the public understand that it will be necessary, Bentley said.
Devereaux said compiling the list "was emotionally difficult for everyone."
That's partly because members believe it's just a matter of time before such a health care disaster hits, she said.
"You never know," Devereaux said. "SARS took a lot of folks by surprise. We didn't even know it existed."
Who should MDs let die in a pandemic? Report offers answers
8mm
52
posted on
05/09/2008 4:26:34 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
We have more from Professor Pope...
.................................
Chris Vogel has a lengthy and detailed story in Thursday's Houston Press, titled "Doctors vs. Parents: Who Decides Right to Life?" It describes a compelling and serious futility dispute that is now headed to court.
14-year-old Sabrina Martin's surgery for a sinus infection did not turn out well. She developed a brain abscess and brain swelling. The staff at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital told Sabrina's parents that Sabrina "had two strokes and because of them, she was in a coma that they didn't think she was going to come out of. And if she did, she would be a vegetable." The staff then "began pressuring them to withhold treatment and feeding."
But they allegedly went far beyond just trying to persuade the parents what they thought was the best course of action. In addition the Memorial Hermann staff:
- Attempt[ed] to turn relatives and friends against Lopez and Murray by encouraging them to persuade the parents to withhold treatment, all the while violating federal privacy laws by discussing Sabrina's healthcare information
- Enter[ed] two separate do-not-resuscitate orders against her parents' wishes
- Threaten[ed] the family with convening the hospital's ethics committee, which under Texas law can overrule the family's wishes and withhold life-support treatment from a patient.
But most serious of all is the allegation that “Memorial Hermann and the doctors and nurses working on the case wanted Sabrina to die to bury the evidence of malpractice and limit the potential damages in court.”
Posted by Thaddeus Mason Pope at 9:57 AM New Futility Case: Martin v. Memorial Hermann
8mm
53
posted on
05/09/2008 4:35:41 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All; Lesforlife
We follow the saga of Haleigh Poutre, have kept the fires stoked as best we could since it all happened. Those not familiar with this story may find it all in previous Terri Dailies. Haleigh has survived not only a beating, but a near fatal effort by Massachusetts Department of Social Services to execute her. Commentary again from Professor Pope from a few days back...
.......................
Yesterday, the Boston Globe reported the recovery of Haleigh Poutre, a 14-year-old girl once diagnosed as being in an "irreversible vegetative state." Haleigh was almost removed from life support by Masachussets DSS after doctors had declared her condition hopeless. She began to breathe on her own just as the state's highest court ruled that she should be allowed to die.
More recently, Haleigh has "provided police with dramatic testimony about frequent use of corporal punishment during her childhood." Haleigh, who has "spent the last two years at a pediatric rehabilitation hospital in Brighton, communicated with simple words and hand gestures in an interview last December. She also spelled out full sentences by pointing to letters of the alphabet on a board."
This is obviously a remarkable recovery for Haleigh. And it may ensure that the parties culpable for her injuries are held criminally responsible. But the downside of this story is that it s publicity may undercut public trust in diagnoses. If we use terms "irreversible vegetative state" with respect to patients who recover, surrogates may be less willing to accept diagnoses and recommendations to stop LSMT. Their patient may be another Haleigh Poutre. I readily concede that diagnoses can almost never be made with 100% certainty. My point is that in our use of language, we ought not imply certainty where none exists.
The "Irreversible" is Reversible After All
8mm
54
posted on
05/09/2008 4:44:09 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: All
Haleigh Poutre update...
..........................
DSS workers can remove a child from their home if they believe the child is at immediate risk of harm. However, DSS strives to keep families intact whenever possible and appropriate.
The agency has come under fire in recent years due to several high-profile abuse cases. Eleven-year-old Haleigh Poutre was beaten by her adoptive mother and stepfather and fell into a coma after DSS had received and dismissed at least 14 prior reports of suspected abuse. Four-year-old Rebecca Riley died of an overdose of psychiatric medications, allegedly given to her by her parents, six months after DSS dismissed a therapist’s concerns she was being overmedicated.
Although CAPTA requires states to preserve confidentiality, CAI and First Star maintain that the only way states can implement meaningful reforms to protect vulnerable children is through greater public disclosure.
“When abuse or neglect lead to a child’s death or near death, the state’s interest in confidentiality is secondary to the interests of the children who would be better protected and served by maximum transparency,” the report argues. “An open system is a better system, draws attention to failures, empowers advocates, and ultimately better protects children.”..............
Child advocate faces challenge
8mm
55
posted on
05/09/2008 4:49:29 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: 8mmMauser
56
posted on
05/09/2008 4:54:39 AM PDT
by
Lesforlife
("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb . . ." Psalm 139:13!!!!!)
To: 8mmMauser
The “challenge” with regards to Haleigh is for society to try to come to grips with just how we became so callous that we would sit by and allow a little girl to be executed AFTER the criminals who tried to kill her failed.
If you read about the troops who liberated the death camps at the end of WWII, they were horrified at what the Nazis had done, but they were even more outraged at the nearby townspeople who knew what was happening and chose to ignore it.
57
posted on
05/09/2008 4:56:19 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: All
In previous Terri Dailies, we recounted constantly the fretting of the left over the legacy of Terri. It is they, no us, who harp continuously on how Terri is not a factor, yet they treat her legacy as an albatros, a burden on their collective psyche. It continues unabated. In this case it is not the writer carrying the burden so much as his recognition of Terri as a factor.
And crime of crimes, the GOP is the party that brought the Terry Schiavo case to a vote in Congress, thereby mixing church and state. I have my doubts that the Terry Schiavo case is an issue that will resonate at the moment with Jewish voters, given Iran's nuclear program nearing completion (Barack Obama says he'll talk to Ahmadinejad about it), economic worries (Barack Obama says the solution is to raise taxes and spend a lot more government money), and the war in Iraq (Barack Obama says get out now, and leave the locals to fend off Iran and al Qaeda)
As it turns out, Democrats in Congress from Illinois voted 4 to 2 for the Schiavo legislation. I really have no interest in how Barack Obama voted on the Schiavo case. I care about his views on Iran, Israel, Iraq, the economy. It turns out Obama was for the Schiavo legislation (voted for it), before being against it (shades of another Democratic presidential candidate I remember)...........
Obama and the Jewish Vote
8mm
58
posted on
05/09/2008 4:59:26 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: Lesforlife
Gee whiz! That looks like, uhhh, hmmmm George Soros!!!
59
posted on
05/09/2008 5:00:30 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
Ping to our Terri Dailies, all about Lauren Richardson.
8mm
60
posted on
05/09/2008 5:05:07 AM PDT
by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,521-1,523 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson