Posted on 05/07/2008 9:14:57 PM PDT by Fred
Ihad been thinking for some time that more attention should be paid to Rush Limbaugh – not to what he says, because it is pretty much the same old rightwing bombast he has been selling for 25 years, but to what he has been urging his legion of 20m similarly inclined radio listeners to do.
This is, wherever state laws allows, that they should register in a Democratic party primary and cast a vote for Hillary Clinton against Barack Obama, the front-runner to be the Democratic presidential nominee. He calls it “operation chaos” and he has been revelling in its claimed success, in Ohio and Pennsylvania, which Mrs Clinton, the senator from New York, won.
This strategy may have met its Waterloo in Indiana. Even though the Limbaugh factor may have handed Mrs Clinton her margin of victory on Tuesday night, it was so wafer-thin – at a 2 per cent margin – as to be immediately deemed insufficient. It certainly did not work in North Carolina, which Mr Obama won comfortably, and where “crossover” voting for the unaffiliated is allowed, but only with complicated strings attached.
I actually do listen to Mr Limbaugh, preferably on the sanitised car radio, which leaves no trace that a liberal wife could decode. I do so on the Flashman principle that you should always know what the enemy is thinking, even if he talks in tongues, and especially if he is smarter and more entertaining than the average conservative, which Mr Limbaugh certainly is.
And you can see the point of operation chaos from his vantage point, both in the short and longer term. If he believes Mrs Clinton would be the weaker candidate against Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee, he can beat up on her until the first Tuesday in November and his ends will have been served if she loses. If she becomes the next president, then he can assault her much as he did her husband for his eight years in office, however long she lasts, maintaining his audience ratings in the process.
Finally, if his strategy of operation chaos does not work out and Mr Obama becomes the nominee, which is now even more likely with his North Carolina victory, then he can ratchet up his harangues against “garden variety liberals” (his standard description of the Illinois senator) who would sell the country down the river and into the slavery of the Chinese.
I think even Mr Limbaugh would concede he has never been Mr McCain’s greatest fan. He preferred Rudy Giuliani early on, with qualifications, and then shifted, with zero enthusiasm, to Mitt Romney, because he was not Mr McCain, whom he considers an apostate from his authorised version of conservatism. But now he is stuck with the Arizona senator.
Now, all this might be fine theory if Mrs Clinton were not playing to his audience, as she reinvents herself from the “garden variety liberal” she certainly was into the San Francisco-denigratin’, huntin,’ shootin’ and shot-drinkin’ mama that is her new political persona. It is not just her espousal of the populist idea of a holiday from the federal petrol tax, also advocated by her vodka shot-drinkin’ friend, Mr McCain, and derided by every economist who has ever been to any known university (including the lawyer, Mr Obama).
It is also the fact that she chose to appear on Bill O’Reilly’s television show on the Fox network. For those who live in Luxembourg or Borneo, Mr O’Reilly is Mr Limbaugh minus several IQ points. He has devoted much of his career, like Mr Limbaugh, to eviscerating the Clintons, but now his blue-collar persona is convenient to her.
All that said, the Limbaugh-O’Reilly-Clinton axis, one that can only have been drawn up on the dark side of the moon where strange bedfellows meet, has cut Mr Obama deeply, if not necessarily fatally as Tuesday’s primaries still leave him holding the whip hand.
There is something compelling about Mr Obama’s cerebral cool, his refusal to play the political game as it is conventionally played. But I am not the audience, even if I could vote, that the game is being played for.
We are slicing and dicing the great American community as it has never been sliced and diced before. Every component part is in play – black, white, men, women, Hispanic, Asian, rich, poor, old, young, Protestant, Catholic, evangelical, Jew and non-believer. Every primary exit poll, which, at least, purports neutrality if not the gospel, carves up the apparent electoral preferences until our minds boggle.
Does, for example, Mr Obama’s long association with his pastor, the Rev Jeremiah Wright, matter or not? Old people say it does, the polls tell us, young people say it does not. And then there is Mr McCain’s relationship with the Rev John Hagge, another “man of the cloth” prone to views that are not in the gospel either.
And when Mr Limbaugh goes on a rant, as he did this week, about “Jerry” Wright allegedly counselling a troubled couple in his church and then marrying the wife after their divorce, then I have to wonder where the war in Iraq, the looming financial crunch and everything else that is out of kilter in this country feature in the election.
Ultimately, the next president will be the one with whom America feels more comfortable and who has a vision for tomorrow not yesterday. I do not think Mr Limbaugh, or operation chaos, figures in that, but I may be wrong.
The writer was twice the FT’s Washington bureau chief
onohana@aol.com
That is absolutely true. I am not anxious to have a liberal Democrat President McCain(R).
The next four years are going to be a rough ride. The last thing we need is for the Republicans to take the blame for the damage the Democrats cause. McCain won't stop them, he will enable them.
This guy is whacked. It is called ‘strategic voting’. Been going on for years. Dems have been doing it forever. Dems gave us McCain for God’s sake. It’s just news because republicans are doing it, and Rush is urging people to do it (and it’s working).
This column is some very hilarious twaddle from a hand-wringing Euro-socialist!
Martin sounds like he wants to take a limo ride with this scumbag Obama.
Antonio, conservatives and America have already lost this election. At this point, every possible outcome produces really bad results. Maybe McCain is a little less bad than HRC or Obama or maybe not--there are good arguments both ways.
Anyone who wonders why conservatives aren't enthusiastically jumping on the McCain bandwagon is probably not a conservative, but a Republican.
Bluntly, my only interest in 2008 is preventing too big a loss in the down-ticket races. HRC gives us a better shot at that than Obama. If we can't get HRC, then having HRC draw blood from Obama is the next best result in that regard.
“He attempted to sabotage John McCain’s nomination.”
Nothing wrong with that.
“Luckily, the Republican Party no longer relies on people like you”
Conservatives.
“and will win with new voters.”
Vive la Raza!
There is something compelling about Mr Obama’s cerebral cool,
*******
Oh please!
Thou shalt have no other Gods before me.
These pips really worship him like a black messiah.
Joined? Joined? Hell, upsdriver is as dyed-in-the-wool, rock-ribbed Reaganite Conservative as they come. A Gen-u-ine card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy if there ever was one.
Luckily, the Republican Party no longer relies on people like you and will win with new voters.
Just keep clickin' those heels there, Dorothy.
I thought that us what you were refering to. I don't consider an eleventh hour panic attack an endorsement.
Sorry to see you have joined the ranks of anti-Republican extremists who will attempt to get Obama elected. Luckily, the Republican Party no longer relies on people like you and will win with new voters.
Who in the world wants Obama to win? We want a conservative president. The only ones attempting to elect Obama are those in the Republican party establishment who have turned a deaf ear to the base. I am aware that the New Republican party doesn't want me. I can't help that. As Billy Joel sang, "We didn't start the fire".
If I was to go along with the New Republicans with the way the feel about me, I would be no better than the blacks who vote Democrat every election.
I agree with you - McCain is fraying.
He was on with Jon Stewart, and he wasn’t doing much better than doddering, being given grudging audience respect as an old grandpa.
You said he forgot where he was today?
“Total yawn! I could care less what he thinks.”
So you actually care in the first place? Why?
“The only preferance Rush had, that I am aware of, was prior to the ‘06 elections, he said he liked Sen. George Allen. That one didn’t work out too well.”
When Rush endorses, he may as well paint a red target on the person’s back. That is why he now refrains from it. “It would ruin his candidacy” he jokes about McCain. But he is right — it would ruin it.
“That is a lie. John McCain was chosen by Republican voters and is supported by Republican leaders.”
Oh, yes. Supported by Republican leaders. But John McCain loses to Romney over and over against actual Republicans. Independents and libes carried John McCain on their shoulders.
“He’s certainly not a liberal, but after backing Bush all these years and after years of refusing to slamm Bush for his Amnesty efforts”
Are you sure you’re talking about Rush Limbaugh here?
Dear Max, Fred didn’t write this. He only posted it. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.