Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoldierDad
Dear SoldierDad,

You were the one running on about “accepting consequences.”

It appears that the person most unable to accept them in this case is you.


sitetest

141 posted on 05/09/2008 2:44:46 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest

You’re confused. You think that when someone’s case is adjudicated that people are unable to profer up their opinion on whether they believe that adjudication was appropriate or not. In other words, you are inferring that I do not have any right to voice an opinion on this one point regarding this incident. I respecfully disagree with your position. There is nothing that prevents me or anyone else with profering a dissenting opinion regarding the outcome of such situations as this. Since it is nothing more than an opinion, and holds no weight with respect to that outcome, there is nothing here you can lay claim to with respect to my being unable to “accept” consequences. Unless, of course, you have the position that people have to right to voice their opinion, which would suggest you are against forums such as FR.


142 posted on 05/09/2008 2:50:37 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triangle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson