Andrew McCarthy said it best in National Review:
“In fact, as between the two of us, its McCains supporters who are deluding themselves. I take them at their word, for example, that a hallmark of the senators politics is his tenacity on matters of principle. Consequently, I am skeptical of his assurances that he would appoint conservative judges who will apply rather than create law. Why? Because he has a recent, determined history of beseeching federal courts to disregard the First Amendment in furtherance of a dubious campaign-finance scheme in which he believes passionately. Conservative judges would (and have) rejected this scheme, just as they would (and have) rejected another signature McCain position: the extension of Geneva Convention protections for jihadists.
Now, the appointment of conservative judges is a crucial issue one McCain posits as central to why we should prefer him to Obama and Clinton. Thus supporters breezily wave off such concerns, maintaining that McCain both promises there will be no issue-based litmus tests for judicial nominees and has conservatives of impeccable legal credentials advising him.
But for me to conclude McCain would surely appoint conservative judges, I also have to believe campaign-finance and the Geneva Convention werent all that big a deal to him after all a possibility that runs counter to everything McCains fans tell us about his fidelity to principle. Hes fought tirelessly for years, in the teeth of blistering criticism, to establish campaign-finance regulations, and Im now supposed to believe hell just shrug his shoulders and meekly name judges wholl torpedo the whole enterprise all in the name of upholding a judicial philosophy Im not even sure he grasps? How exactly is it deranged to have my doubts?”
That was an interesting post on McCain by Andrew McCarthy in National Review. The gist of what I read was that McCarthy just about destroys Mccain’s creds in the overall WOT effort. With out that McCain will have nothing for Conservatives...