Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema
A "clear majority" of the panel adopted what it called a "biocentric" moral view, meaning that "living organisms should be considered morally for their own sake because they are alive."

As long as it isn't an unborn baby, that is....

71 posted on 05/03/2008 8:30:15 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; wagglebee; cpforlife.org

Exactly. Those babies have no legal existence until suddenly they are old enough for use as pawns in UN initiatives and ACLU ‘child rights’ suits against schools and parents.


77 posted on 05/03/2008 8:39:51 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson