It is true that one can determine a lot about the content of a work by reading what is said about it and what, as is generally accepted, it is reported to contain.
Nonetheless, if you're going to write a review, as a professional, for a national publication, you really ought to see it first.
Sheesh.
Reminds me of David Letterman bashing O’Reilly, when Bill asked what it was that he said that David disagreed with, Letterman didn’t have a clue, never actually even heard him, but nevertheless said it was “stupid”...whatever it was.
Elitists and liberals are like that, can’ think for themselves, but allow the pack mentality to do their thinking for them. Oblivious as to how stupid it is, AND how idiotic it makes them.