I have read the King James version cover to cover a few times and the Catholic Bible once. I have several Bibles in my library along with a number of concordances, including wycliff’s bible comentary. Don’t spout glory to me in a discussion of science. Science is about evidence.
I woud suggest reading a more modern Translation of the Bible - the New King James version is good but also the New International version.
This suggestion has to do with a search for truth.
Is not science interested in just that? Truth?
Don’t you know, for instance, that the science of archeology has proven over and over and over again that the facts in the Bible given about historical incidents / places / names have been PROVEN to be accurate???
If the Bible presents TRUTH about history, for instance, which it does —— that history includes the history of creation of life.
For instance, it includes the cataclysmic FLOOD to which the millions of fossils of ocean animals in the middle of desserts and on the tops of mountains and thousands of miles “inland” testify as accurate. Does that not even draw you to find out more of what is given in the TRUTHS revealed in the Bible - and matching up with the evidence?
Just asking...