Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TN4Liberty
Besides, using scientific method does not account for final proof of anything, only evidence in support of, or in contradiction to a hypothesis.

You are correct. A scientific theory is based on the preponderance of evidence, a natural law is based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. There is NO scientific evidence for ID. That is called a myth.

205 posted on 04/27/2008 4:02:19 PM PDT by Soliton (McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Soliton
A scientific theory is based on the preponderance of evidence

Bzzt. Sorry. Wrong. A single contrary example can negate a theory and no amount of evidence can make a theory a fact.

209 posted on 04/27/2008 5:36:13 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (Election 2008 - American Idol except no one can sing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson