To: canuck_conservative
I have made this case many times. The imperfection of biology suggests evolution, rather than ID/Creationism. In fact, the complexity of biological processes that is the main pillar of ID, is really an argument AGAINST ID.
A supernatural being/God doesn’t have to create through complexity. It/He is not subject to the laws of nature. Nature, on the other hand, must obey the laws of physics.
2 posted on
04/27/2008 3:05:34 AM PDT by
Soliton
(McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
To: Soliton
evolution, OK; Evolution, mot so much. God does in fact work more through nature and the natural law He ordains than through “miracles”.
It’s quite a leap of faith to lay all to blind chance.
11 posted on
04/27/2008 3:42:47 AM PDT by
steve8714
(Always do what's right, even if it hurts. This is the lesson of Job.)
To: Soliton
Gee, according to the Bible, our imperfections came out of disobedience and some day our bodies will be made perfect and eternal as God originally designed them. I'll look at the improbability of the Bible being written over a few thousand years, by over a hundred authors, and managing to not contradict itself, and compare it to a bunch of scientists who are always guessing and theorizing about things, while changing their opinions/theories every few years or so. Once done, I'll give God His due credit.
Have a great day.
90 posted on
04/27/2008 7:00:56 AM PDT by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: Soliton
...and from where, exactly, did the “laws of physics” come?
197 posted on
04/27/2008 3:46:44 PM PDT by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson