[Coyoteman]

SIn order for change, life had to begin. Please provide a reasonable hypothesis, from your religion, “science”.

Science is not a religion. It is dishonest to claim that it is.

As for origins? Beats me.

Here are five hypothesis regarding the origin of the first life forms.

a) Natural processes occuring entirely upon earth resulted in chains of self-replicating molecular strands that eventually became the first life forms.

b) Aliens from another planet and/or dimension travelled to this planet and -- deliberately or accidentally -- seeded the planet with the first life forms.

c) In the future, humans will develop a means to travel back in time. They will use this technology to plant the first life forms in Earth's past, making the existence of life a causality loop.

d) A divine agent of unspecified nature zap-poofed the first life forms into existence.

e) Any method other than the four described above led to the existence of the first life forms.

The theory of evolution works just fine with any of these origins.

[WVKayaker]

please give just one explanation of how it all began. If aliens did it, they had an origin...

How does life come into being from inert materials? where did the inert materials originate?

Science is indeed a religion. It requires much more faith than I can muster!

re·li·gion (rĭ-lĭj'ən) pronunciation n.

1.

1. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.

2. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship.

2. The life or condition of a person in a religious order.

3. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.

4. A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.

#4 fits just fine, for a definition of "scientists".they have faith in their beliefs, deep faith.