To: Aria; Kurt Evans
When Kurt Evans (if that is his real name) was shilling for Huckabee, Huckabee had already no chance of winning, and was doing nothing but sabotaging Mitt Romney, clearing the way for McCain. There was no other logical outcome.
Now that McCain is the nominee due to Huckabee’s efforts, Mr. Evans suddenly is for Alan Keyes, trying to lead people like a pied piper away from the GOP completely and to the Constitution Party. The net result, if people were to follow his lead would be Obama as the next President. There is no other logical outcome. Kurt’s actions have either been calculated, or out of abject stupidity. It can only be one or the other.
5 posted on
04/25/2008 11:01:47 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(Kick McCain upstairs)
To: counterpunch; Aria; Kurt Evans; EternalVigilance; The Mayor; trooprally; Just A Nobody
There are more—and more honorable—reasons than your either/or scenario.
Some are dismayed to the point of abhorrance at the Gramscian sabotage and sullying within the GOP leadership, whether your personal key issues are fiscal and/or Biblical (’SoCon’) reasons.
I believe it better to throw the usurpers and corrupters out than to abandon the GOP. Others believe otherwise but not all are stupid, or smart shills. In this case, dissent is not unpatriotic.
I agree with Keyes’ stated principles but not his strategies, as I’ve said elsewhere.
I wish more Conservatives would understand and stand ardently for the principles Keyes advocates.
7 posted on
04/25/2008 11:12:56 PM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: counterpunch
Ah ha....I see what you’re saying.
Well Keyes effect on this election will be nil - no matter what anyone says.
8 posted on
04/25/2008 11:25:37 PM PDT by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: counterpunch
Kurt's actions have either been calculated, or out of abject stupidity. It can only be one or the other.
I believe the most dangerous candidates for president in this cycle were (1) Romney, (2) McCain, (3) Obama and (4) Clinton. It admittedly took me some time to figure out that Giuliani wasn't a serious threat, and I didn't become convinced Romney was an egomaniacal fraud until the Reagan library debate.
The critical difference between a liberal Democrat president and a liberal Republican president is that the Democrat would face substantial congressional opposition. Congressional Republicans have already begun rolling over for McCain's liberalism.
9 posted on
04/25/2008 11:51:18 PM PDT by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: counterpunch
24 posted on
04/26/2008 1:15:21 AM PDT by
1035rep
To: counterpunch
When Kurt Evans (if that is his real name) was shilling for Huckabee, Huckabee had already no chance of winning, and was doing nothing but sabotaging Mitt Romney, clearing the way for McCain. There was no other logical outcome. Now that McCain is the nominee due to Huckabees efforts, Mr. Evans suddenly is for Alan Keyes, trying to lead people like a pied piper away from the GOP completely and to the Constitution Party. The net result, if people were to follow his lead would be Obama as the next President. There is no other logical outcome. Kurts actions have either been calculated, or out of abject stupidity. It can only be one or the other.
You know for a guy who was first for Rudy (Even a worse candidate than McAmnesty if that is possible) and against Thompson ( who many said could not win) and then strongly for Thompson, you really do not have a leg to stand on talking down to people about changing candidates.
What was that scripture again, oh yea, something to the effect of taking care of the Beam in your eye before trying to take care of the toothpick in somebody elses eye.
36 posted on
04/26/2008 1:37:18 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson