Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
I have studied the actual "hard facts" supporting evolution, handling hundreds of fossil casts for hundreds of hours in grad school, as well as studying other aspects of the field.- Coyoteman

The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so.- Ronald Reagan ("A Time for Choosing" address)

Liberals fill themselves with a myriad of facts and then leap to mythical conclusions. Coyoteman, I think you and I have been down this road before. The existence of fossils (truth) does not validate Darwin's atheistic and fatally flawed Theory of Evolution (myth).

Since I don't know how to copy over a link, I refer you to an earlier discussion we had on this below:

The Abolition of Man? How Politics and Culture Have Been Dehumanized in the Name of Science Friday, March 07, 2008 10:45:12 AM · 260 of 272 Jim 0216 to Coyoteman From an earlier post: Giving examples (of intelligent design pointing to an intelligent designer/creator) feels like pointing out trees in a forest, but here's a couple that I've given before:

- DNA - a miraculous and incredible amount of intelligent information and code in an infinitesimally small building-block of life.

- Your ear - The inner ear has three multi-directional nerve/sensors elegantly designed to help you keep your balance. They're called semicircular canals - three loops of fluid-filled tubes that are attached to the cochlea in the inner ear. They help us maintain our sense of balance. Each of these loops goes in a different direction, so that all three together helps maintain one's equilibrium no matter what angle your body is in.

- Any detailed study of a leaf or your eye or anything in your body or any living thing. More evidence than the sand of the sea.

Sorry Coyoteman, but again, calling the evidence I've presented and dismissing intelligent design as "religion in disguise" doesn't refute intelligent design. Calling these facts "a statement of my beliefs" doesn't refute these facts. I couldn't care less about the Discovery Institute, and calling it silly has nothing to do with refuting intelligent design. I'm not impressed with whatever these attempts are to somehow deflect focus on the undeniably of intelligent design. I'm also not I impressed with evolutionists' "evidence" which is paltry, sad, and often found to be a fraud.

Next.

76 posted on 04/26/2008 2:59:01 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216
Jim, there is no point in continuing this discussion.

You are denying evidence before your very eyes, so there is nothing I could do to show it to you.

78 posted on 04/26/2008 3:44:10 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson