Wrong. It's not an attack on religious freedom. It's going after illegal activity.
Does religious freedom mean I can do anything I want without any fear of reprisals or repercussions if I wrap it in the cloak of *religion*?
Child sacrifice have been part of many religions for many thousands of years. Should that be protected, too?
Can I decide to do whatever I want and claim it's religious activity and avoid prosecution for crimes? After all, I simple have a different set of morals. Who are you to judge? It's my religion to rob banks and murder people. It's my religion to not pay taxes. It's my religion to blow away noisy neighbors who play their music too loud or throw parties after midnight.
The *they're coming after you next* hysteria is getting more than a little old.
I said the massive attack was an attack on religious freedom. Meaning taking every kid in the joint. If the the teenage girls were “at risk” then just take them until you square everything away. They never would have done this in a pot smoking hippy convent where they were having orgies every night. The Manson family did not even get this treatment.