I'm sorry, I missed your post #49 where you actually stated just what was wrong with the article. I must have been busy answering you accusatory post #46. : )
Doing a quick search I find nothing. So I think it safe to say that you are correct that she has not been charged in the Texas case at this time.
Do you care to issue a retraction?
I am neither the author or the publisher of the article in question. You have the link. Ask them to print a retraction.
My guess is that it was just sloppy reporting being as they linked other news article that contradicted that fact as you pointed out.
Thank you for clarifying.
I have nothing against any of you guys. I’ve never called you or any other poster Mormon, or pedophile, or rapist, and I never would. I have asked several posters with whom I am familiar, to clarify their Mormon affiliation, in the sake of honesty and openness. As everyone seems to be well aware, I am an ex-mormon and so I bring my own perception with me. Those who are active LDS have a perspective as well as those who have been harrassed by LEOs. When we can see motivations for actions and opinions it helps us clarify our own positions. I have no problem at all with y’all knowing that I am a former-mormon.
I too have concerns about the overreaching by CPS. Perhaps when more facts come out about the case, we freepers will be able to find more comfortable middle-ground.