I never saw you ask me what I thought. My guess is that some or most of the younger kids were safe. But there may have been evidence of abuse from SOME of the pre-teens — there is nothing in the court record that identifies any specific abuse in that age group, but that doesn’t mean for certain they don’t HAVE evidence that they simply haven’t made public.
Among older kids it would seem highly improbable that NO abuse was going on. While the teen pregnancies do not PROVE abuse, they surely raise the possibility of abuse. If people said there was a strong enough possibility of abuse that those kids had to be removed, I wouldn’t argue. I only argue with people who insist that the pregnancy and early childbearing PROVE there was rape.
The DNA will prove if there was statutory rape. And those men better be punished severely. And if the mothers of those kids participated, they should be punished as well.
But if you posted a woman’s picture, and asked me “is she guilty”, I’d have to say I have NO IDEA if that specific woman did anything, was charged with anything, or was suspected of anything.
When the group was removed to safety from the compound, the ‘mothers’ —young and older— would not all tell which children were theirs. The confusion from this deceit was why the court decided to just keep them all until the connections could be verified. At least that is what some on the scene have reported to us here at Freeper Central. [FR search ‘barkeep’, for one.]
Interesting post. You make some good points.
If Rozita is a delagate,why isn’t this in breaking news all over the country?