Posted on 04/16/2008 9:11:18 PM PDT by moderatewolverine
It is only four months into 2008, but the presidential campaign already too long and nasty is still a long way from over. And the casualties are mounting.
First, George W. Bushs popularity remains dismal even though some of the complaints about his first term have gone by the wayside. The French and German governments are now staunchly pro-American. Violence in Iraq is still way down from a year ago. America has been free from a terrorist attack since 9/11.
No matter. Nothing has seemed to help the president. His approval rating stays at, or sinks below, 30 percent.
Why? The current gloomy economic news and the continuing human and financial costs of Afghanistan and Iraq explain a lot. But another reason is this present election cycle. For the first time in nearly six decades, no incumbent president or vice president is daily hammering back in defense of the recent four years.
(Excerpt) Read more at primetimepolitics.com ...
Let me know if you want in or out.
Links: FR Index of his articles: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=victordavishanson
His website: http://victorhanson.com/
NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp
Pajamasmedia: http://victordavishanson.pajamasmedia.com/
I think you're exaggerating. I think there's a bucket's difference.
"W" will go down in history as a selfless patriot. The Abraham Lincoln of our time.
Bushes approval ratings are low because he disappointed consevatives with his push for “comprehnsive” immigration reform. He fought us tooth and nail. Why didn’t he fight that hard for personal savings accounts or drilling in ANWR?
Argh...Gobal Warming BS
Global
Keep in mind that Bush is getting information from a variety of sources, not all of them reliable. When he called the Minutemen vigilantes it was because that is what was told to him by the head of the Border Patrol. I suspect that the bp union may be behind much of that.
There is much complexity involved in doing something as simple as “Just enforce the existing law.” and “Punish the employers.” As I said above, and you seem to ignore, there are many in this country (the left, the Democrat Party, the media, local looneys in Sanctuary Cities, etc.) who want and encourage illegals as new voters for the Democrats. All of them make solving the problem much harder. Yet, Bush is moving ahead with all the necessary steps of building the fence, punishing the employers, and all the other things required to solve the problem.
He just doesn’t tout his efforts and the media ignore them.
You’re very insightful on McCain’s current strategy to let the Dems go at each other, and yes, he has an extremely tough line to walk in the general. I really hope he has brilliant strategists and staff with excellent timing and who know just when to go for the jugular. You’re so right about the challenges (mine-fields) he’ll face in this unusual race, and in our uber-politically correct culture. Who woulda’ thunk it.
>> “W” will go down in history as a selfless patriot. <<
He certainly SHOULD be remembered that way. But it may take a long time for today’s BDS to fade away.
>> The Abraham Lincoln of our time. <<
That’s a little strong for my tastes. I’d prefer to say, “The Harry Truman of our time.”
[I’m old enough to remember well how strongly my father and his peers detested Truman in 1948. I grew up thinking HST was the devil incarnate. Yet fifty years later, in 1998, my father was “just wild about Harry!”]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.