[maine-iac7]

As I said, it doesn’t bother me, but to me one picture of Bush standing in front of a podium looks pretty much like any other picture of Bush in front of a podium.

You'd make a great politician.

First you post your thinly disguised hint that the daily photos of our POTUS is taking up too much bandwidth - not that it bothers you (cough cough) and then you again plug it's demise, again with the disclaimer "As I said, it doesn't bother me, BUT..."

And oabamama doesn't support abortion or what the Rev. Wrong spouts or believe that the Typical White Person is a Bitter, gun-toting, Jesus-loving hick.

Yep. You seem to be a perfect candidate for politics - of the far left.

(BTW. Don't you think worry about band-width is up to Jim R. Don't you think he can handle it?)

This graphic may illustrate your posture.

[wagglebee]

If you had bothered to read the comment I was responding to, it was talking about how newbies used to get a lot of grief for posting articles that have already been posted.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2001161/posts?page=35#35

I was simply pointing out that a new thread in and of itself doesn’t use up that much bandwidth, what does is the posting of graphics. I then offered the example of numerous pictures of Bush at a podium. YOU extrapolated some convoluted notion that I opposed graphics.

Additionally, your inference that I somehow was supporting Obama’s position on abortion is totally without merit. I probably post the majority of pro-life threads here on FR; and while I’ve had plenty of things said about me, NOBODY has EVER implied that I am pro-abortion. Furthermore, your contention that I am somehow far-left is equally without uncalled for.

[trisham]

I have no idea what you are talking about.

[floriduh voter]

gramma, as far as I know, wagglebee is a genuine conservative who will hold his nose to vote for John McCain. He’s pro-life and anti-left as far as I know.