Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker; PennsylvaniaMom
Thank you both for your excellent and succinct posts.

GovernmentShrinker, I have a question for you. What law allows them to not let the men back on the ranch if they leave?

Another question for either one of you, is there a possibility that among the cell phones they picked up, one could have been the one the child used to call the domestic violence hot line?

430 posted on 04/14/2008 1:05:39 PM PDT by Pebcak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: Pebcak

Wow, I think you’re the only person who’s ever called me “succinct”! Are you sure you know what it means? :-)

Re the current no-return policy, I expect that is connected to the search warrants. I doubt that either the FBI or state has officially completed its search. If they let these men leave and come back, there’s a risk of phony evidence being snuck onto the property and the leaders subsequently claiming it was there all along.

Re the cell phone, I suppose that’s possible, but I doubt it’s the main reason the phones were collected. However, since the phones were inside the compound when the search warrants were issued, they would be subject to thorough search. I rather doubt that was done on the way out, especially since doing it thoroughly would have required strip-searching all the women and children. Presumably it’s being done now — checking all the names and numbers in the contact lists, photos stored, e-mails on Blackberry-type devices, etc.


437 posted on 04/14/2008 1:24:24 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson