Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato

“That may be true, but they were still taken away from their mothers, were they not? “

For many of these children, their ‘mothers’ are in name only.

They aren’t sure or told who their biological mother is.

They are traded like baseball cards between ‘husbands’.


173 posted on 04/14/2008 12:40:21 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
They aren’t sure or told who their biological mother is.

A child doesn't care much about "biological" parents. They care about Mommy and sometimes Daddy. I have 3 females, none of them biologically related to me although two are my wife's great nieces, and two who are my biological daughters, who call me Dad or Daddy. I can't imagine a finer title thing for a man to be called.

Right now there are a whole bunch of real live children who are wondering where Mommy is. That would be true even if, like some Indian tribes, they called every woman in the community "Mother". To cause all that misery among those innocents, the authorities better have all their duck in a row, their coffee saucered and blown, and all their 'i's dotted and their 't's crossed. Else, sure as can be, they will be returned to the status quo ante, and the taxpayers of Texas, of which I am one, will be out a bunch of bucks. I hear on the news today that the kids have been moved again.

444 posted on 04/14/2008 4:33:14 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson