I have to say that there is truth in this statement. I think alot of the reasons for this comes from the fact the the two major parties have completely different views on foreign policy and that it is next to impossible to maintain a consistent effort on an issue when our overall foreign policy is subject to change every few years. This gives the impression that the US has a schizophrenic foreign policy, which we do.
Governments take positions that suit the times. Such is the way of the world. One must look at the overall progress toward a long range goal.
If true, JWB would not continue "our" support of 'greater albania' and we would not be choosing between three possible candidates equally driven to amnesty for (mexican) illegal aliens. Elites follow elites and rarely their own interpretation of doctrine.
On the other hand; the 1944 citation addresses an entirely different subject than today's "my name and my name only" fiasco:
"The Greek section of Macedonia is largely inhabited by Greeks, and the Greek people are almost unanimously opposed to the creation of a Macedonian state."
...refers to a 'Greater Macedonia" made up of territory from a Slav 'Macedonia' and a Greek 'Macedonia'. It takes a stretch to claim that only one state can use the name Macedonia because the old subject might resurface - unless they are planning against a repeat of Kosova/Albania.
However:
If the Greeks win, and "Macedonia" has to change it's name to "Louise" or some such...
I demand that the state south of California USA be renamed to "West Cesspool", or "Baja del Norte", or simply "Theirs"..."Baja California" infringes on my ethnic rights.