Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZacandPook

I read that bit about Florida and NJ in that verbiage in this very post. I went back and re-read it but I am way too tired to find it tonight. But I read it....something about he could have been there.

Hey lookit, the guy was taking Cipro...odd. You can wink away the bloodhound thing but at a Denny’s diner, at his girlfriend’s house...when the dogs showed NO response at any other suspects’ homes?

Criminal investigations require investigators go with the odds. This Hatfill guy, sheesh, I think that an investigator that did NOT check into him would be lax indeed. Which doesn’t give said investigators the right to go casting aspersions at someone who is only being investigated and hey, that’s why God made civil courts. Let’s see if Hatfill wins.

There’s an awful lot of circumstantial evidence pointing to Hatfill. An awful lot.

I know the FBI screwed up with the Atlanta thing but this doesn’t mean they’re wrong about Hatfill. There’s an awful lot pointing to this guy,.

I’m not convinced he’s Mister Innocent. It does seem that the FBI can’t get enough on him to convict him but please....I am in no way convinced Hatfill is all that innocent.

Your mileage may vary.


45 posted on 04/13/2008 7:03:27 PM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Fishtalk

We agree that if the investigators did not check into him they would have been lax indeed. There were three squads — one science/forensics, the other two investigating the two principal theories. We will call the investigative squads Squad A and B and the science squad C. Interesting Youtube video below. Chief investigator Lambert states that the FBI people examining the scientific forensic evidence were NOT ALLOWED to exchange information with the team examining the person of interest evidence. The news all came from work of Squad A. For example, see the deposition excerpt by Arthur Eberhart who retired in August 2002. The work of the other squad likely is classified — such as the NSA wiretaps reportedly use to snare the communications between Al-Timimi and Bin Laden’s sheik. He hand-delivered a threat in al-Hawali’s name warning of dire consequences if Iraq was invaded to every member of Congress on the first anniversary of the anthrax to the Senators. Bin Uthman, who met with AQ military commander Atef and Ayman Zawahiri in the summer of 2000 in Kandahar to discuss WMD, has said in an open letter to Zawahiri that the reason WMD was going to be used/threatened was to deter invasion. He argues that Zawahiri miscalculated. For example, the use of anthrax actually led to invasion rather than deterred it.

I agree that his prospects in the lawsuit are highly problematic. His experience in the libel suits have shown that. But there is no evidence he was in New Jersey. In his deposition, Pat Clawson provided no alibi for him beyond the long days he was spending at SAIC as reflected by his timesheets.

He had a prescription for Cipro reportedly due to dental work or a nasal infection — I forget which. Antiobiotics before oral surgery avoids endocarditis. 20,000-30,000 people each year die from infections affecting a heart valve. Let’s hope when we take penicillin — such as I was prescribed for I can’t remember what this past year — we are not accused of serial murder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrNSZ66zvrc


48 posted on 04/14/2008 1:33:24 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Fishtalk
There’s an awful lot of circumstantial evidence pointing to Hatfill. An awful lot.

On the contrary. There is absolutely NOTHING point to Dr. Hatfill.

He was taking Cipro for some kind of infection he had. A doctor had prescribed it for him weeks before 9/11.

He was NOT up to date on his anthrax shots, as people claimed.

He never worked with anthrax.

He didn't have access to anthrax while at USAMRIID.

He didn't have the "bench skills" to make the powder found in the senate letters.

He didn't have unsupervised access to the equipment needed to make the powders.

He has witnesses who will testify that he was working on the days of the mailings. And on the Sunday before the second mailing he was at a wedding. He was no where near the place the letters were mailed and had never been in that area.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

63 posted on 04/14/2008 7:43:23 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Fishtalk
"There’s not a scintilla of evidence to suggest Dr. Hatfill had anything to do with it."- Judge Reggie Walton

You really need to learn one of these days not to take everything that you read as the gospel truth, because many of the facts you're spouting out here are nothing but nonsensical rumors.

73 posted on 04/14/2008 8:51:10 AM PDT by jpl ("Don't tell me words don't matter." - Barack Obama, via Deval Patrick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson