Actually it’s MUCH more simple than that. When you publish statements in peer reviewed science journals you are required to provide data to back them up. No data = discredited. The peer review process failed here - but that shouldn’t surprise us when we know the identity of the peer reviewer.
Stop squabbling.
The 3 pictures that prove you are both dunces are here. Post them all or post none of them.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze43v8m/anthraxandalqaeda.html