Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy

Very funny. I meant to type “greatly less than” or “significantly less than”.


99 posted on 04/09/2008 12:46:05 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre
Feed reliability partly comes from the fact that bullet diameter is less than case diameter.

Just right offhand, I can't immediately recall any round that has a bullet diameter greater than the case diameter....

Very funny. I meant to type “greatly less than” or “significantly less than”.

You're thinking of the idea that such a design, frequently including a taper to the overall case dimension, is more easily guided into the chamber during the feeding cycle. But that may work against reliable feeding within the magazine body, [or belt link] in that the space between rounds offers a place for dust/sand/mud to collect and de-lubricate the cartridges during the feed cycle. I'm waiting to see how a pal's .450 Hornady [.450 Bushmaster, .450 Thumper]conversion for his M4 works out, but the reduction of magazine capacity is not exactly what I'm after.


103 posted on 04/09/2008 1:33:37 PM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson