Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: potlatch
Our water from the river is already being taken over by San Antonio north of us and nuke plants use HUGE amounts of water.

Nuclear plants use a great deal of water for cooling, but they don't use it up. It's discharged back in a couple hundred feet downstream at a higher temperature.

In an ideal world I wouldn't want anything in my backyard. But when the alternative is burning a billion - literally, billion with a B - tons of coal a year and releasing tens of thousands of tons of NOx, SO2, etc. that isn't even a decision.

Every day we sit on our collective hands arguing about whether nuclear is a good enough solution is another day of using the dirtiest and most dangerous power source there is by default.

79 posted on 04/08/2008 6:09:25 PM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: CGTRWK

I believe they are looking into the discharged water. Naturally they will say it has been thoroughly ‘cleaned’.

Yes, I realize we need these plants but still want them to be isolated.


93 posted on 04/08/2008 6:21:48 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson