Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
I know some on FR poo-poo such things as a hydrogen fuel cell car on pure politcal as giving into the envirowhackos, but I see it as anything that gets the US off OPEC oil, I see as a good thing, since IIRC, about 60% of the petroleum use in the US is for transportation.

It's not poo-pooing Hydrogen because of envirowackos, it's poo-pooing hydrogen as a means of getting us off of fossil fuels.

Hydrogen is a means of storing energy, not making it. The #1 source of Hydrogen for fuel cell automobiles is from petroleum.

Neither solar, wind, or geothermal electricity is anywhere near efficient enough to provide enough energy for our transportation needs, so unless I see 20 new Nuclear Powerplants per week being started in the US, I will continue to poo-poo Hydrogen fuel cell automobiles as a boondogle.

20 posted on 04/08/2008 4:21:11 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

We should be building more nuclear plants, not only does it create jobs, but will help the US get off OPEC oil, a win-win situation for America.


23 posted on 04/08/2008 4:24:33 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson