What ammnunition are we giving them? The warrant was valid since it was based upon the testimony of a reliable eyewitness. What more would the authorities need? All they need is probable cause that a crime has been committed and that evidence of that crime can be found in the location. Where would you think that would be lacking in this case?
Evidence notwithstanding, evidence which indicates collusion between local authorities and baptists against mormons (true or not, in fact I do not believe there IS collusion) only has to give ONE juror “reasonable doubt”.