Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.

I know. I was just chiming in. I wasn’t really directing my comment to you personally, just to the idea that the superdelegates were always beyond her reach. I think until very recently they WEREN’T beyond her reach, at least not completely.

But now all has changed. Now they are completely beyond her reach.

(I’m not arguing the point, I’m just posting my take on the situation. I’m not saying you’re wrong, just saying the way I see it.)


63 posted on 04/04/2008 8:17:45 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
I’m not saying you’re wrong, just saying the way I see it

No problems, no offense on my part was taken. However, we are kind of talking two different things here.

You are referencing who is easier to beat, Obama or Hillary. A valid case could be made either way.

The original comment I made was to someone who believed that Hillary would be preferred as President over Obama, because Hillary is less liberal then he is. That is what I took exception to. Hillary has gone to great lengths to deceive people into thinking she is not a left wing extremist.

Thanks for your input.

64 posted on 04/04/2008 8:23:32 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson